Category Archives: Uncategorized

Rising ‘food forests’ bring free fruit and heat relief to Boston’s neighborhoods

Small patches of land provide relief from the heat, battle climate change, and provide some free fruit in Boston neighborhoods

By Ryan Krugman Inside Climate News October 3, 2025

Original Post

“Edible forests” are popping up in Boston. Scattered across the city, once-empty lots have been overtaken by fruit trees and berry-filled bushes. Open to the public, they are forage-friendly pockets in the urban grid.

The rise of urban food forests in Boston can be attributed to the decade-long work of the nonprofit Boston Food Forest Coalition, also known as the BFFC. The group’s mission is to enhance low- and middle-income neighborhoods lacking green spaces. Over the past 10 years, the coalition has built more than a dozen food forests and caught the attention of city planners.

“When we first got started, we were dumpster diving for cardboard and other materials to help with soil remediation and beautification of abandoned lots,” said Orion Kriegman, BFFC’s founder and executive director.

The roots of the organization began at a trash-filled lot around the corner from Kriegman’s apartment in 2014 in Egleston Square, not far from the Franklin Park Zoo. With his neighbors joining in with shovels and spades, the crew spent hours digging up beer bottles, even a car that was half-buried in the soil. Within months, a small food forest filled with budding flowers and edible shrubs had sprouted.

Food forests differ from traditional community gardens by design and intent. While community gardens typically feature raised beds with caretakers seeding flowering annual plants, food forests center around perennial and indigenous fruit-bearing plants, mimicking the ecosystems of untamed woodlands in lots that range from 10 by 10 feet to the size of a city block.

Jose Garcia, 9, right, inspected some lichen on a stump with his friends during the grand opening of the Edgewood Food Forest in Mattapan in  2023.
Jose Garcia, 9, right, inspected some lichen on a stump with his friends during the grand opening of the Edgewood Food Forest in Mattapan in 2023.Erin Clark/Globe Staff

When BFFC opened the Egleston Community Orchard, the city owned the land. That meant that at any point, the city could decide to develop it. So in 2015, Kriegman formally established BFFC as a community land trust that can acquire and hold land to ensure it remains permanently accessible for community use.

“We realized all our good work could be lost if we didn’t actually own the land,” Kriegman said.

From Mattapan to the North End, the nonprofit has now opened 13 food forests, with a goal of opening 30 by 2030 — a target shared by the city as part of its 2030 Climate Action Plan. The idea is simple: More trees and plants provide shade in areas lacking green space and suck carbon dioxide, the primary greenhouse gas that drives global warming, from the atmosphere.

The carbon reductions from small patches of land may be small, but every tree or shrub makes a difference.

“Boston has ambitious climate goals, and the only way to achieve them is with robust efforts from diverse stakeholders,” said Elizabeth Jameson, director of climate policy and planning for Boston’s environment department.

The Ellington Street Community Food Forest Garden in Dorchester in 2023.
The Ellington Street Community Food Forest Garden in Dorchester in 2023.Dre Tejada

The mayor’s housing office’s Grassroots Open Space Development Program and the Boston Planning and Development Agency provide city-owned parcels at reduced prices. The land the city distributes for grassroots initiatives is typically undesirable — due to size, location, or inaccessibility — for real estate or commercial development.

When a community identifies a site it wants transformed into a food forest, BFFC helps residents prepare a proposal. If approved — after a years-long process of community meetings — the city transfers the parcel into the group’s land trust, ensuring permanent community ownership.

Kriegman’s hope is that since food forests are now officially part of the city’s climate plan, the approval process will quicken, arguing that 30 food forests in a city of almost 700,000 people could be transformative.

Boston Food Forest Coalition sites

There are 13 food forests across the city according to the coalition.

That’s because urban food forests can enhance biodiversity, offset pollution by filtering out pollutants such as nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter, and mitigate the urban heat island effect — the double whammy of heat trapped by asphalt and concrete. Vegetation and soils in food forests combat that heat. Trees and shrubs provide shade, plants release moisture, and soil naturally absorbs and stores heat more gradually.

A 2025 study by researchers in Taiwan examined a rooftop farm and other sites over three years and found lots with food forests were cooler on average by 2.2 degrees Celsius, about 4 degrees Fahrenheit, than surrounding areas.

The cooling effect of a small green space doesn’t extend far beyond the site itself — up to 100 meters — but expanding the number of food forests across a city could ease heat stress in neighborhoods that lack green spaces.

In Boston’s historically Black communities, there is a 20 percent disparity in accessible parklands and a 40 percent disparity in tree coverage compared with predominantly white neighborhoods, according to Boston’s Heat Resilience Plan. That means Black communities feel, on average, 7.5 degrees Fahrenheit warmer during heat waves.

Beyond mitigating heat stress and pollution, food forests also provide fresh produce and a gathering hub.

More than 525 fruit trees and shrubs, with apples and cherries alongside lesser-known fruits such as pawpaws and serviceberries, can be found in Boston’s food forests. It’s all free with one caveat: take only what you need. Communities use the parks for picnics, birthday parties, movie nights, and yoga classes.

Neighborhood residents, called community stewardship teams, care for the land and collectively govern it through BFFC’s community land trust. Stewardship team leaders — 73 percent are women and 47 percent are people of color — ensure that community voices shape the coalition’s direction.

Every response is decided collectively — whether the problem is drought or an infestation of pests — a process that fosters trust-building and balances urgency with consensus.

That can be a challenge, too, said Kriegman. “Most people understand individual ownership, so it’s a constant challenge trying to educate people on what it means to own land together.”

The movement is growing despite headwinds from Washington. In May, the Environmental Protection Agency terminated $60 million for its Environmental Justice for New England Program. BFFC had been approved for a $250,000 grant, and it is unclear whether the organization will receive the money.

Still, momentum is not slowing. The nonprofit coalition has opened two food forests this year, and in August, it broke ground on a third site in Dorchester. It plans to open two or three new food forests in 2026.

“We’re moving faster than the city can keep up with because community demand and interest continue to grow,” Kriegman said.

This story is published in partnership with Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, independent news organization that covers climate, energy, and the environment.

Yes Farms, Yes Food

A Beacon of Hope for Local Food Access

You’ve seen the bumper sticker: “No Farms, No Food” or perhaps its positive inverse: “Yes Farms, Yes Food.” Both are reminders—or maybe warnings—pasted onto the back of any number of Subarus and pick-up trucks around New England gesturing to the connection between working farms and the food we eat every day. It’s an important message (our members certainly drive with bumpers adorned), and while memorable in its simplicity, it begs some questions. What kind of farms? And where? Food for whom, exactly?

For better or worse, our current national policies around food and agriculture provide plenty of answers. Take the farm bill, for example. Passed about every five years, this massive package of legislation funds the vast majority of agricultural and nutrition programs in this country. It sets policy dictating which farmers and what kinds of farms get government support, and carves out who is (and who is not) eligible for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and other forms of food assistance.

In farm bill discourse, food production and food access are too often treated as two opposite poles—never the twain shall meet—or simply as bargaining chips to force Democrats and Republicans to come to the table. Our government often invests in SNAP benefits at the cost of divesting from sustainable farming supports. These efforts could instead be seen as two sides of the same coin. SNAP benefits, which are proven to help lift people out of poverty and give folks critical access to nutrition, could also bolster local economies and support farm viability, clean drinking water, healthy soil, and climate stabilization if our national policies also prioritized the existence of local organic farms.

This short-sighted thinking continues in the farm bill proposal recently introduced by House Agriculture Committee Chair Glenn Thompson, which divests from both food security and climate-smart farming practices. (Editors’ note: The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition [NSAC] has excellent and comprehensive analyses of both the House and Senate Farm Bills, examining both packages’ approaches to food, farm, and conservation policy and funding. See the NSAC Blog for the full complement of context and analysis.)  The House Farm Bill proposes what amounts to a $30 billion cut in SNAP funding and undermines critical support for organic farmers and others seeking to adopt climate-friendly practices. These policies reveal disdain toward people needing food assistance and antagonism toward farmers concerned about anything beyond their short-term yields.

In a stark, though welcome, contrast, the Senate Agriculture Committee, led by Chair Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, and including Vermont’s own Senator Peter Welch, also recently released their version of the Farm Bill. The Senate version includes many provisions that importantly would support organic and small diversified farms. It would protect and increase funding for conservation practices that support climate change mitigation and resilience (such as organic farming), improve and expand nutrition assistance, and include direct support for farm workers and other food system workers.

Customers pick up local, organic food at People’s Farm Stand in Burlington, Vermont. Photo courtesy of NOFA-VT.

We’re seeing synergies between farming and food access closer to home here in Vermont, as well; our Vermont state legislators have recently set a powerful example of how we can do things differently. By appropriating $300,000 to NOFA-VT’s local food access programs, Crop Cash and Farm Share, our policymakers have demonstrated that they understand it is possible (and even popular) to make policy choices that keep people fed while investing in local, organic farms. These programs are a win-win, subsidizing the cost of locally grown food either by partially covering the cost of a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) membership or by giving people extra cash to buy fruits and vegetables when they spend their SNAP benefits at farmers markets, resulting in income for local farmers. Equivalent programs are making big, tangible impacts around the region, and we are finally seeing new state-level funding and support. With $1.2 million in new funding for Maine Harvest Bucks and a proposed $20 million contribution to the Massachusetts Healthy Incentive Program, policymakers across New England are dedicating new levels of support to similar intersecting and impactful nutrition and farm viability efforts.

Our collective food security depends on a viable agricultural sector. Public investment in programs like Crop Cash and Farm Share puts locally grown food within reach for neighbors and community members with limited incomes, allowing them to buy food that aligns with their values while directly reinvesting in their own community. It helps farmers reach more customers and ensures they are paid a fair price for their products. It brings in federal dollars that so often leave the state through multi-national chain grocers, instead circulating them in our local economy.

“Our government often invests in SNAP benefits at the cost of divesting from sustainable farming supports. These efforts could instead be seen as two sides of the same coin.”

This effort to expand local food access programs is just one piece of the puzzle in the broader strategy outlined in Food Security in Vermont: Roadmap to 2035, a new report authored by NOFA-VT, the Vermont Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets, and a number of other food access and equity advocates around the state. The roadmap presents perhaps the clearest articulation yet of how the State of Vermont can make policy choices that ensure food security for everyone who lives here, and lays out an achievable timeline for reaching that reality. Developed and informed by community members from all walks of life, the roadmap lays out a framework giving voice to what Vermonters already know: Investing in our farmers is an investment in our future. This report has set the stage for future policy efforts to be grounded within a collaborative strategy toward ending hunger, and we’re excited to see what new initiatives emerge moving forward. 

As we celebrate this legislative victory and our step toward food security, it’s clear that the State of Vermont has clarified the bumper sticker slogan: Yes to our local, ecological farms, and yes to food for all people. By keeping this momentum and sticking to our values, maybe better federal and state policy for our food system is truly possible.


Maddie Kempner is the Policy Director at the Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont (NOFA-VT). NOFA-VT advocates for public policy that supports a just, sustainable food system at the state and national level.

Issue 4 Feature Autumn 2024 Farmlands Food SystemsVermont

US targets surging grocery prices in latest probe

Aug 1, 2024 (Reuters) – The U.S. Federal Trade Commission will probe why grocery prices remain high even as costs for retailers fall, Chair Lina Khan said on Thursday, a key theme for the Biden-Harris administration.

Once the FTC votes to authorize the study, major grocery chains would be ordered to provide information on their costs and prices on common products. Khan made the announcement at a public meeting with Justice Department officials on pricing practices.

Continue reading US targets surging grocery prices in latest probe

To fix the food system, fix our democracy

People go hungry not from lack of food but from lack of political power.

BY FRANCES MOORE LAPPÉ

Today’s multiplying threats are truly scary — a deadly pandemic with vast economic losses, police murders reflecting endemic racism, a president trashing constitutional protections, and . . . oh yes, a pending climate catastrophe.

So fear is inevitable, and, of course, it can ignite action that saves lives. But fear can also do the opposite.Supported By

Fifty years ago, our world was also gripped by fear. Paul Ehrlich’s book “The Population Bomb” predicted “mass starvation” on a “dying planet.” The ensuing scarcity scare triggered a fixation on ever-greater production of food.

Along the way, agribusinesses have warned that only their seeds and agricultural chemicals could save us. “Worrying about starving future generations won’t feed them. Food biotechnology will,” declared a 1998 Monsanto ad.

Continue reading To fix the food system, fix our democracy

Food system causes one third of greenhouse gases

Original Post – November 13th, 2020, by Tim Radford

A New Zealand feedlot, 2020: Not good for the cattle, nor us, nor the planet. Image: By SAFE, via Wikimedia Common

How we eat causes dangerous climate heating. It’s time to change not only our diet, but the entire global food system.

LONDON, 13 November, 2020 − If the nations of the world really want to limit climate change to the level agreed five years ago, it will not be enough to immediately abandon fossil fuels as the principal source of energy: the global food system demands radical overhaul.

Humans will have to make dramatic changes to every aspect of agriculture worldwide, to planetary diet and to much else besides.

That is because the global food system − everything from clearing land and felling forests for cattle ranches to the arrival of meat and two vegetables on a suburban family dinner plate − accounts for 30% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions. And to contain global heating later this century to no more than 1.5°C above the levels that existed before the Industrial Revolution, urgent action is needed.

Continue reading Food system causes one third of greenhouse gases

Are their jobs for college graduates in sustainable agriculture?

gradOne of my most popular blogs was “Sustainable agriculture jobs after college”  in which I reflected on the process of getting work after graduating college. ”  In this next essay, I share a few thoughts about the jobs situation in sustainable agriculture.  My conclusion is that while there is much work that needs to be done, well-paying, meaningful lifetime “career” jobs that offer a sense of security are hard to find.  At the same time, many mid-career folks  who have security are finding their work unfulfilling.

It may be that getting hired for a lifetime job is an unrealistic expectation in our emerging “on-demand” economy.  And while that realization may feel disheartening, it Continue reading Are their jobs for college graduates in sustainable agriculture?

Sustainable Site Planning and Design

STOCKSCH 386 – 3 credits

online

To Enroll – Start Here

Instructor:  David Berle    dberle@umass.edu

The most fundamental role of the Designer is to inspire and solve problems creatively and practically. Site design is both an art and science. Landscape designers are place-makers and space-shapers. Sustainable site design considers the impacts to future generations of the design solutions we choose to solve today’s problems. By thoughtfully synthesizing site information, namely the natural and human factors that affect a site, we can create environmentally sensitive solutions that serve human constituents and the natural world.

Course Description:  This course will be an exploration of the fundamentals of landscape design with particular attention to sustainability and with a view to reducing maintenance needs. Students will investigate sustainable design strategies that address the ecological, water resource, energy, and food system links between buildings and their supporting sites. Topics include design principles and process, natural factors (e.g. topography, soils, vegetation), green roofs, green walls/vertical gardens, rainwater collection, native plants, edible landscapes, sustainable forestry practices, and the human use of outdoor spaces. Emphasis will be placed on permaculture practices and cost saving techniques with a focus on residential and farm scale design. Real world examples will be discussed.

This is an introductory course focusing on the theory and practice of sustainable landscape design and planning. It is assumed that students have little or no background/professional experience in design or planning. The course relies primarily on readings, videos, and recorded lectures. There will also be participatory assignments that provide practical experience analyzing a site and developing a basic landscape plan.

One online course alone cannot provide all the skills necessary to become a landscape designer. However, students who complete this course will have a greater understanding of the design process, the ability to analyze a site, and skills to express design ideas verbally and on paper.

Course Objectives: In this course, students will …

· Gain an understanding of sustainable landscape design principles and practices including environmental and human factors

· Evaluate a site to consider energy, food and natural resource issues as part of the landscape design process.

· Improve communication skills related to professional-client relations

· Develop skills required to prepare a basic sustainable landscape plan

Module 1: Introduction to Landscape Design 

  • Course objectives and learning outcomes 
  • Historical overview of landscape design traditions 
  • Design philosophy and approaches 
  • Sustainable design principles 

Module 2: Design Fundamentals 

  • Elements of design: line, form, color, texture, scale 
  • Design principles: balance, rhythm, emphasis, unity, proportion 
  • Creating functional diagrams and bubble plans 
  • Spatial organization 

Module 3: Plant Selection and Design Application 

  • Plant identification and classification 
  • Right plant, right place: matching plants to site conditions 
  • Plant characteristics for design (form, texture, color, seasonal interest) 
  • Plant combinations and layering strategies 

Module 4: Ecological Design and Residential Applications 

  • Foundation plantings and entry gardens 
  • Edible landscapes 
  • Pollinator gardens 
  • Green roofs and green walls 
  • Permaculture principles and applications 
  • Biodiversity considerations in landscape planning 

Module 5: Hardscape Elements and Integration 

  • Patios, walkways, and gathering spaces 
  • Walls, fences, and boundaries 
  • Materials selection and sustainability considerations 

Module 6: Site Analysis and Client Assessment 

  • Site inventory and analysis techniques 
  • Environmental factors assessment (soil, water, light, climate) 
  • Water management 
  • Front and backyard design considerations 
  • Tree protection and management 
  • Measuring and site documentation 

Module 7: Design and Landscape Plan Process 

  • Needs assessment 
  • Conceptual design development process 
  • Basic drafting techniques and digital design tools 

Module 8: Landscape Design Implementation 

  • Common landscape design rules-of-thumb 
  • Creating planting plans  
  • Cost estimation and project budgeting 

Technology  Please review the following:

Supported Browsers and Java Versions (Windows PC and Mac)
Please see the Blackboard Help page for the most current supported and unsupported browsers.

System Requirements: PC / Compatible Windows

  • Windows XP (32/64-bit), Windows Vista (32/64-bit), Windows 7, or Windows 8
  • 800 MHz processor (2 GHz or higher recommended)
  • 512MB of RAM (2+ GB recommended)
  • Cable or DSL connection. (dial-up modem is not recommended)
  • 500 MB free hard disk space (2 GB recommended)

System Requirements: Mac

    • Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) or higher
    • 867 MHz processor (2 GHz or higher recommended)
    • 512MB of RAM (2+ GB recommended)
    • Cable or DSL connection (dial-up modem is not recommended)
    • 500 MB free hard disk space (2 GB recommended)

NOTE: for more information, see Technical Support.

—————————————————————————————————–

This class is part of the Sustainable Food and Farming Online Certificate Program and will count toward other UMass degree programs.   Online classes cost $555/credit.  If you would like to register for the Certificate program, you may apply here.

More Online Classes

NOTE: The UMass Sustainable Food and Farming Certificate has been declared eligible for Veterans Educational Benefits. For instructions see: Veterans Benefits.

If you are not interested in earning college credit, there are many non-credited workshops and short courses you can take outside of the university.  For a list see: non-university workshops and courses.